linux/Documentation/admin-guide/syscall-user-dispatch.rst
<<
>>
Prefs
   1.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
   2
   3=====================
   4Syscall User Dispatch
   5=====================
   6
   7Background
   8----------
   9
  10Compatibility layers like Wine need a way to efficiently emulate system
  11calls of only a part of their process - the part that has the
  12incompatible code - while being able to execute native syscalls without
  13a high performance penalty on the native part of the process.  Seccomp
  14falls short on this task, since it has limited support to efficiently
  15filter syscalls based on memory regions, and it doesn't support removing
  16filters.  Therefore a new mechanism is necessary.
  17
  18Syscall User Dispatch brings the filtering of the syscall dispatcher
  19address back to userspace.  The application is in control of a flip
  20switch, indicating the current personality of the process.  A
  21multiple-personality application can then flip the switch without
  22invoking the kernel, when crossing the compatibility layer API
  23boundaries, to enable/disable the syscall redirection and execute
  24syscalls directly (disabled) or send them to be emulated in userspace
  25through a SIGSYS.
  26
  27The goal of this design is to provide very quick compatibility layer
  28boundary crosses, which is achieved by not executing a syscall to change
  29personality every time the compatibility layer executes.  Instead, a
  30userspace memory region exposed to the kernel indicates the current
  31personality, and the application simply modifies that variable to
  32configure the mechanism.
  33
  34There is a relatively high cost associated with handling signals on most
  35architectures, like x86, but at least for Wine, syscalls issued by
  36native Windows code are currently not known to be a performance problem,
  37since they are quite rare, at least for modern gaming applications.
  38
  39Since this mechanism is designed to capture syscalls issued by
  40non-native applications, it must function on syscalls whose invocation
  41ABI is completely unexpected to Linux.  Syscall User Dispatch, therefore
  42doesn't rely on any of the syscall ABI to make the filtering.  It uses
  43only the syscall dispatcher address and the userspace key.
  44
  45As the ABI of these intercepted syscalls is unknown to Linux, these
  46syscalls are not instrumentable via ptrace or the syscall tracepoints.
  47
  48Interface
  49---------
  50
  51A thread can setup this mechanism on supported kernels by executing the
  52following prctl:
  53
  54  prctl(PR_SET_SYSCALL_USER_DISPATCH, <op>, <offset>, <length>, [selector])
  55
  56<op> is either PR_SYS_DISPATCH_ON or PR_SYS_DISPATCH_OFF, to enable and
  57disable the mechanism globally for that thread.  When
  58PR_SYS_DISPATCH_OFF is used, the other fields must be zero.
  59
  60[<offset>, <offset>+<length>) delimit a memory region interval
  61from which syscalls are always executed directly, regardless of the
  62userspace selector.  This provides a fast path for the C library, which
  63includes the most common syscall dispatchers in the native code
  64applications, and also provides a way for the signal handler to return
  65without triggering a nested SIGSYS on (rt\_)sigreturn.  Users of this
  66interface should make sure that at least the signal trampoline code is
  67included in this region. In addition, for syscalls that implement the
  68trampoline code on the vDSO, that trampoline is never intercepted.
  69
  70[selector] is a pointer to a char-sized region in the process memory
  71region, that provides a quick way to enable disable syscall redirection
  72thread-wide, without the need to invoke the kernel directly.  selector
  73can be set to SYSCALL_DISPATCH_FILTER_ALLOW or SYSCALL_DISPATCH_FILTER_BLOCK.
  74Any other value should terminate the program with a SIGSYS.
  75
  76Security Notes
  77--------------
  78
  79Syscall User Dispatch provides functionality for compatibility layers to
  80quickly capture system calls issued by a non-native part of the
  81application, while not impacting the Linux native regions of the
  82process.  It is not a mechanism for sandboxing system calls, and it
  83should not be seen as a security mechanism, since it is trivial for a
  84malicious application to subvert the mechanism by jumping to an allowed
  85dispatcher region prior to executing the syscall, or to discover the
  86address and modify the selector value.  If the use case requires any
  87kind of security sandboxing, Seccomp should be used instead.
  88
  89Any fork or exec of the existing process resets the mechanism to
  90PR_SYS_DISPATCH_OFF.
  91