qemu/tests/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c
<<
>>
Prefs
   1/*
   2 * Block node graph modifications tests
   3 *
   4 * Copyright (c) 2019 Virtuozzo International GmbH. All rights reserved.
   5 *
   6 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
   7 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
   8 * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
   9 * (at your option) any later version.
  10 *
  11 * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
  12 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
  13 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
  14 * GNU General Public License for more details.
  15 *
  16 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
  17 * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
  18 *
  19 */
  20
  21#include "qemu/osdep.h"
  22#include "qapi/error.h"
  23#include "block/block_int.h"
  24#include "sysemu/block-backend.h"
  25
  26static BlockDriver bdrv_pass_through = {
  27    .format_name = "pass-through",
  28    .bdrv_child_perm = bdrv_filter_default_perms,
  29};
  30
  31static void no_perm_default_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
  32                                         const BdrvChildRole *role,
  33                                         BlockReopenQueue *reopen_queue,
  34                                         uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared,
  35                                         uint64_t *nperm, uint64_t *nshared)
  36{
  37    *nperm = 0;
  38    *nshared = BLK_PERM_ALL;
  39}
  40
  41static BlockDriver bdrv_no_perm = {
  42    .format_name = "no-perm",
  43    .bdrv_child_perm = no_perm_default_perms,
  44};
  45
  46static BlockDriverState *no_perm_node(const char *name)
  47{
  48    return bdrv_new_open_driver(&bdrv_no_perm, name, BDRV_O_RDWR, &error_abort);
  49}
  50
  51static BlockDriverState *pass_through_node(const char *name)
  52{
  53    return bdrv_new_open_driver(&bdrv_pass_through, name,
  54                                BDRV_O_RDWR, &error_abort);
  55}
  56
  57/*
  58 * test_update_perm_tree
  59 *
  60 * When checking node for a possibility to update permissions, it's subtree
  61 * should be correctly checked too. New permissions for each node should be
  62 * calculated and checked in context of permissions of other nodes. If we
  63 * check new permissions of the node only in context of old permissions of
  64 * its neighbors, we can finish up with wrong permission graph.
  65 *
  66 * This test firstly create the following graph:
  67 *                                +--------+
  68 *                                |  root  |
  69 *                                +--------+
  70 *                                    |
  71 *                                    | perm: write, read
  72 *                                    | shared: except write
  73 *                                    v
  74 *  +-------------------+           +----------------+
  75 *  | passtrough filter |---------->|  null-co node  |
  76 *  +-------------------+           +----------------+
  77 *
  78 *
  79 * and then, tries to append filter under node. Expected behavior: fail.
  80 * Otherwise we'll get the following picture, with two BdrvChild'ren, having
  81 * write permission to one node, without actually sharing it.
  82 *
  83 *                     +--------+
  84 *                     |  root  |
  85 *                     +--------+
  86 *                         |
  87 *                         | perm: write, read
  88 *                         | shared: except write
  89 *                         v
  90 *                +-------------------+
  91 *                | passtrough filter |
  92 *                +-------------------+
  93 *                       |   |
  94 *     perm: write, read |   | perm: write, read
  95 *  shared: except write |   | shared: except write
  96 *                       v   v
  97 *                +----------------+
  98 *                |  null co node  |
  99 *                +----------------+
 100 */
 101static void test_update_perm_tree(void)
 102{
 103    Error *local_err = NULL;
 104
 105    BlockBackend *root = blk_new(BLK_PERM_WRITE | BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ,
 106                                 BLK_PERM_ALL & ~BLK_PERM_WRITE);
 107    BlockDriverState *bs = no_perm_node("node");
 108    BlockDriverState *filter = pass_through_node("filter");
 109
 110    blk_insert_bs(root, bs, &error_abort);
 111
 112    bdrv_attach_child(filter, bs, "child", &child_file, &error_abort);
 113
 114    bdrv_append(filter, bs, &local_err);
 115
 116    g_assert_nonnull(local_err);
 117    error_free(local_err);
 118
 119    bdrv_unref(bs);
 120    blk_unref(root);
 121}
 122
 123/*
 124 * test_should_update_child
 125 *
 126 * Test that bdrv_replace_node, and concretely should_update_child
 127 * do the right thing, i.e. not creating loops on the graph.
 128 *
 129 * The test does the following:
 130 * 1. initial graph:
 131 *
 132 *   +------+          +--------+
 133 *   | root |          | filter |
 134 *   +------+          +--------+
 135 *      |                  |
 136 *  root|            target|
 137 *      v                  v
 138 *   +------+          +--------+
 139 *   | node |<---------| target |
 140 *   +------+  backing +--------+
 141 *
 142 * 2. Append @filter above @node. If should_update_child works correctly,
 143 * it understands, that backing child of @target should not be updated,
 144 * as it will create a loop on node graph. Resulting picture should
 145 * be the left one, not the right:
 146 *
 147 *     +------+                            +------+
 148 *     | root |                            | root |
 149 *     +------+                            +------+
 150 *        |                                   |
 151 *    root|                               root|
 152 *        v                                   v
 153 *    +--------+   target                 +--------+   target
 154 *    | filter |--------------+           | filter |--------------+
 155 *    +--------+              |           +--------+              |
 156 *        |                   |               |  ^                v
 157 * backing|                   |        backing|  |           +--------+
 158 *        v                   v               |  +-----------| target |
 159 *     +------+          +--------+           v      backing +--------+
 160 *     | node |<---------| target |        +------+
 161 *     +------+  backing +--------+        | node |
 162 *                                         +------+
 163 *
 164 *    (good picture)                       (bad picture)
 165 *
 166 */
 167static void test_should_update_child(void)
 168{
 169    BlockBackend *root = blk_new(0, BLK_PERM_ALL);
 170    BlockDriverState *bs = no_perm_node("node");
 171    BlockDriverState *filter = no_perm_node("filter");
 172    BlockDriverState *target = no_perm_node("target");
 173
 174    blk_insert_bs(root, bs, &error_abort);
 175
 176    bdrv_set_backing_hd(target, bs, &error_abort);
 177
 178    g_assert(target->backing->bs == bs);
 179    bdrv_attach_child(filter, target, "target", &child_file, &error_abort);
 180    bdrv_append(filter, bs, &error_abort);
 181    g_assert(target->backing->bs == bs);
 182
 183    bdrv_unref(bs);
 184    blk_unref(root);
 185}
 186
 187int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 188{
 189    bdrv_init();
 190    qemu_init_main_loop(&error_abort);
 191
 192    g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
 193
 194    g_test_add_func("/bdrv-graph-mod/update-perm-tree", test_update_perm_tree);
 195    g_test_add_func("/bdrv-graph-mod/should-update-child",
 196                    test_should_update_child);
 197
 198    return g_test_run();
 199}
 200