1================= 2QEMU Coding Style 3================= 4 5.. contents:: Table of Contents 6 7Please use the script checkpatch.pl in the scripts directory to check 8patches before submitting. 9 10Formatting and style 11******************** 12 13Whitespace 14========== 15 16Of course, the most important aspect in any coding style is whitespace. 17Crusty old coders who have trouble spotting the glasses on their noses 18can tell the difference between a tab and eight spaces from a distance 19of approximately fifteen parsecs. Many a flamewar has been fought and 20lost on this issue. 21 22QEMU indents are four spaces. Tabs are never used, except in Makefiles 23where they have been irreversibly coded into the syntax. 24Spaces of course are superior to tabs because: 25 26* You have just one way to specify whitespace, not two. Ambiguity breeds 27 mistakes. 28* The confusion surrounding 'use tabs to indent, spaces to justify' is gone. 29* Tab indents push your code to the right, making your screen seriously 30 unbalanced. 31* Tabs will be rendered incorrectly on editors who are misconfigured not 32 to use tab stops of eight positions. 33* Tabs are rendered badly in patches, causing off-by-one errors in almost 34 every line. 35* It is the QEMU coding style. 36 37Do not leave whitespace dangling off the ends of lines. 38 39Multiline Indent 40---------------- 41 42There are several places where indent is necessary: 43 44* if/else 45* while/for 46* function definition & call 47 48When breaking up a long line to fit within line width, we need a proper indent 49for the following lines. 50 51In case of if/else, while/for, align the secondary lines just after the 52opening parenthesis of the first. 53 54For example: 55 56.. code-block:: c 57 58 if (a == 1 && 59 b == 2) { 60 61 while (a == 1 && 62 b == 2) { 63 64In case of function, there are several variants: 65 66* 4 spaces indent from the beginning 67* align the secondary lines just after the opening parenthesis of the first 68 69For example: 70 71.. code-block:: c 72 73 do_something(x, y, 74 z); 75 76 do_something(x, y, 77 z); 78 79 do_something(x, do_another(y, 80 z)); 81 82Line width 83========== 84 85Lines should be 80 characters; try not to make them longer. 86 87Sometimes it is hard to do, especially when dealing with QEMU subsystems 88that use long function or symbol names. Even in that case, do not make 89lines much longer than 80 characters. 90 91Rationale: 92 93* Some people like to tile their 24" screens with a 6x4 matrix of 80x24 94 xterms and use vi in all of them. The best way to punish them is to 95 let them keep doing it. 96* Code and especially patches is much more readable if limited to a sane 97 line length. Eighty is traditional. 98* The four-space indentation makes the most common excuse ("But look 99 at all that white space on the left!") moot. 100* It is the QEMU coding style. 101 102Naming 103====== 104 105Variables are lower_case_with_underscores; easy to type and read. Structured 106type names are in CamelCase; harder to type but standing out. Enum type 107names and function type names should also be in CamelCase. Scalar type 108names are lower_case_with_underscores_ending_with_a_t, like the POSIX 109uint64_t and family. Note that this last convention contradicts POSIX 110and is therefore likely to be changed. 111 112When wrapping standard library functions, use the prefix ``qemu_`` to alert 113readers that they are seeing a wrapped version; otherwise avoid this prefix. 114 115Block structure 116=============== 117 118Every indented statement is braced; even if the block contains just one 119statement. The opening brace is on the line that contains the control 120flow statement that introduces the new block; the closing brace is on the 121same line as the else keyword, or on a line by itself if there is no else 122keyword. Example: 123 124.. code-block:: c 125 126 if (a == 5) { 127 printf("a was 5.\n"); 128 } else if (a == 6) { 129 printf("a was 6.\n"); 130 } else { 131 printf("a was something else entirely.\n"); 132 } 133 134Note that 'else if' is considered a single statement; otherwise a long if/ 135else if/else if/.../else sequence would need an indent for every else 136statement. 137 138An exception is the opening brace for a function; for reasons of tradition 139and clarity it comes on a line by itself: 140 141.. code-block:: c 142 143 void a_function(void) 144 { 145 do_something(); 146 } 147 148Rationale: a consistent (except for functions...) bracing style reduces 149ambiguity and avoids needless churn when lines are added or removed. 150Furthermore, it is the QEMU coding style. 151 152Declarations 153============ 154 155Mixed declarations (interleaving statements and declarations within 156blocks) are generally not allowed; declarations should be at the beginning 157of blocks. 158 159Every now and then, an exception is made for declarations inside a 160#ifdef or #ifndef block: if the code looks nicer, such declarations can 161be placed at the top of the block even if there are statements above. 162On the other hand, however, it's often best to move that #ifdef/#ifndef 163block to a separate function altogether. 164 165Conditional statements 166====================== 167 168When comparing a variable for (in)equality with a constant, list the 169constant on the right, as in: 170 171.. code-block:: c 172 173 if (a == 1) { 174 /* Reads like: "If a equals 1" */ 175 do_something(); 176 } 177 178Rationale: Yoda conditions (as in 'if (1 == a)') are awkward to read. 179Besides, good compilers already warn users when '==' is mis-typed as '=', 180even when the constant is on the right. 181 182Comment style 183============= 184 185We use traditional C-style /``*`` ``*``/ comments and avoid // comments. 186 187Rationale: The // form is valid in C99, so this is purely a matter of 188consistency of style. The checkpatch script will warn you about this. 189 190Multiline comment blocks should have a row of stars on the left, 191and the initial /``*`` and terminating ``*``/ both on their own lines: 192 193.. code-block:: c 194 195 /* 196 * like 197 * this 198 */ 199 200This is the same format required by the Linux kernel coding style. 201 202(Some of the existing comments in the codebase use the GNU Coding 203Standards form which does not have stars on the left, or other 204variations; avoid these when writing new comments, but don't worry 205about converting to the preferred form unless you're editing that 206comment anyway.) 207 208Rationale: Consistency, and ease of visually picking out a multiline 209comment from the surrounding code. 210 211Language usage 212************** 213 214Preprocessor 215============ 216 217Variadic macros 218--------------- 219 220For variadic macros, stick with this C99-like syntax: 221 222.. code-block:: c 223 224 #define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) \ 225 do { printf("IRQ: " fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__); } while (0) 226 227Include directives 228------------------ 229 230Order include directives as follows: 231 232.. code-block:: c 233 234 #include "qemu/osdep.h" /* Always first... */ 235 #include <...> /* then system headers... */ 236 #include "..." /* and finally QEMU headers. */ 237 238The "qemu/osdep.h" header contains preprocessor macros that affect the behavior 239of core system headers like <stdint.h>. It must be the first include so that 240core system headers included by external libraries get the preprocessor macros 241that QEMU depends on. 242 243Do not include "qemu/osdep.h" from header files since the .c file will have 244already included it. 245 246C types 247======= 248 249It should be common sense to use the right type, but we have collected 250a few useful guidelines here. 251 252Scalars 253------- 254 255If you're using "int" or "long", odds are good that there's a better type. 256If a variable is counting something, it should be declared with an 257unsigned type. 258 259If it's host memory-size related, size_t should be a good choice (use 260ssize_t only if required). Guest RAM memory offsets must use ram_addr_t, 261but only for RAM, it may not cover whole guest address space. 262 263If it's file-size related, use off_t. 264If it's file-offset related (i.e., signed), use off_t. 265If it's just counting small numbers use "unsigned int"; 266(on all but oddball embedded systems, you can assume that that 267type is at least four bytes wide). 268 269In the event that you require a specific width, use a standard type 270like int32_t, uint32_t, uint64_t, etc. The specific types are 271mandatory for VMState fields. 272 273Don't use Linux kernel internal types like u32, __u32 or __le32. 274 275Use hwaddr for guest physical addresses except pcibus_t 276for PCI addresses. In addition, ram_addr_t is a QEMU internal address 277space that maps guest RAM physical addresses into an intermediate 278address space that can map to host virtual address spaces. Generally 279speaking, the size of guest memory can always fit into ram_addr_t but 280it would not be correct to store an actual guest physical address in a 281ram_addr_t. 282 283For CPU virtual addresses there are several possible types. 284vaddr is the best type to use to hold a CPU virtual address in 285target-independent code. It is guaranteed to be large enough to hold a 286virtual address for any target, and it does not change size from target 287to target. It is always unsigned. 288target_ulong is a type the size of a virtual address on the CPU; this means 289it may be 32 or 64 bits depending on which target is being built. It should 290therefore be used only in target-specific code, and in some 291performance-critical built-per-target core code such as the TLB code. 292There is also a signed version, target_long. 293abi_ulong is for the ``*``-user targets, and represents a type the size of 294'void ``*``' in that target's ABI. (This may not be the same as the size of a 295full CPU virtual address in the case of target ABIs which use 32 bit pointers 296on 64 bit CPUs, like sparc32plus.) Definitions of structures that must match 297the target's ABI must use this type for anything that on the target is defined 298to be an 'unsigned long' or a pointer type. 299There is also a signed version, abi_long. 300 301Of course, take all of the above with a grain of salt. If you're about 302to use some system interface that requires a type like size_t, pid_t or 303off_t, use matching types for any corresponding variables. 304 305Also, if you try to use e.g., "unsigned int" as a type, and that 306conflicts with the signedness of a related variable, sometimes 307it's best just to use the *wrong* type, if "pulling the thread" 308and fixing all related variables would be too invasive. 309 310Finally, while using descriptive types is important, be careful not to 311go overboard. If whatever you're doing causes warnings, or requires 312casts, then reconsider or ask for help. 313 314Pointers 315-------- 316 317Ensure that all of your pointers are "const-correct". 318Unless a pointer is used to modify the pointed-to storage, 319give it the "const" attribute. That way, the reader knows 320up-front that this is a read-only pointer. Perhaps more 321importantly, if we're diligent about this, when you see a non-const 322pointer, you're guaranteed that it is used to modify the storage 323it points to, or it is aliased to another pointer that is. 324 325Typedefs 326-------- 327 328Typedefs are used to eliminate the redundant 'struct' keyword, since type 329names have a different style than other identifiers ("CamelCase" versus 330"snake_case"). Each named struct type should have a CamelCase name and a 331corresponding typedef. 332 333Since certain C compilers choke on duplicated typedefs, you should avoid 334them and declare a typedef only in one header file. For common types, 335you can use "include/qemu/typedefs.h" for example. However, as a matter 336of convenience it is also perfectly fine to use forward struct 337definitions instead of typedefs in headers and function prototypes; this 338avoids problems with duplicated typedefs and reduces the need to include 339headers from other headers. 340 341Reserved namespaces in C and POSIX 342---------------------------------- 343 344Underscore capital, double underscore, and underscore 't' suffixes should be 345avoided. 346 347Low level memory management 348=========================== 349 350Use of the malloc/free/realloc/calloc/valloc/memalign/posix_memalign 351APIs is not allowed in the QEMU codebase. Instead of these routines, 352use the GLib memory allocation routines g_malloc/g_malloc0/g_new/ 353g_new0/g_realloc/g_free or QEMU's qemu_memalign/qemu_blockalign/qemu_vfree 354APIs. 355 356Please note that g_malloc will exit on allocation failure, so there 357is no need to test for failure (as you would have to with malloc). 358Calling g_malloc with a zero size is valid and will return NULL. 359 360Prefer g_new(T, n) instead of g_malloc(sizeof(T) ``*`` n) for the following 361reasons: 362 363* It catches multiplication overflowing size_t; 364* It returns T ``*`` instead of void ``*``, letting compiler catch more type errors. 365 366Declarations like 367 368.. code-block:: c 369 370 T *v = g_malloc(sizeof(*v)) 371 372are acceptable, though. 373 374Memory allocated by qemu_memalign or qemu_blockalign must be freed with 375qemu_vfree, since breaking this will cause problems on Win32. 376 377String manipulation 378=================== 379 380Do not use the strncpy function. As mentioned in the man page, it does *not* 381guarantee a NULL-terminated buffer, which makes it extremely dangerous to use. 382It also zeros trailing destination bytes out to the specified length. Instead, 383use this similar function when possible, but note its different signature: 384 385.. code-block:: c 386 387 void pstrcpy(char *dest, int dest_buf_size, const char *src) 388 389Don't use strcat because it can't check for buffer overflows, but: 390 391.. code-block:: c 392 393 char *pstrcat(char *buf, int buf_size, const char *s) 394 395The same limitation exists with sprintf and vsprintf, so use snprintf and 396vsnprintf. 397 398QEMU provides other useful string functions: 399 400.. code-block:: c 401 402 int strstart(const char *str, const char *val, const char **ptr) 403 int stristart(const char *str, const char *val, const char **ptr) 404 int qemu_strnlen(const char *s, int max_len) 405 406There are also replacement character processing macros for isxyz and toxyz, 407so instead of e.g. isalnum you should use qemu_isalnum. 408 409Because of the memory management rules, you must use g_strdup/g_strndup 410instead of plain strdup/strndup. 411 412Printf-style functions 413====================== 414 415Whenever you add a new printf-style function, i.e., one with a format 416string argument and following "..." in its prototype, be sure to use 417gcc's printf attribute directive in the prototype. 418 419This makes it so gcc's -Wformat and -Wformat-security options can do 420their jobs and cross-check format strings with the number and types 421of arguments. 422 423C standard, implementation defined and undefined behaviors 424========================================================== 425 426C code in QEMU should be written to the C99 language specification. A copy 427of the final version of the C99 standard with corrigenda TC1, TC2, and TC3 428included, formatted as a draft, can be downloaded from: 429 430 `<http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf>`_ 431 432The C language specification defines regions of undefined behavior and 433implementation defined behavior (to give compiler authors enough leeway to 434produce better code). In general, code in QEMU should follow the language 435specification and avoid both undefined and implementation defined 436constructs. ("It works fine on the gcc I tested it with" is not a valid 437argument...) However there are a few areas where we allow ourselves to 438assume certain behaviors because in practice all the platforms we care about 439behave in the same way and writing strictly conformant code would be 440painful. These are: 441 442* you may assume that integers are 2s complement representation 443* you may assume that right shift of a signed integer duplicates 444 the sign bit (ie it is an arithmetic shift, not a logical shift) 445 446In addition, QEMU assumes that the compiler does not use the latitude 447given in C99 and C11 to treat aspects of signed '<<' as undefined, as 448documented in the GNU Compiler Collection manual starting at version 4.0. 449 450Automatic memory deallocation 451============================= 452 453QEMU has a mandatory dependency either the GCC or CLang compiler. As 454such it has the freedom to make use of a C language extension for 455automatically running a cleanup function when a stack variable goes 456out of scope. This can be used to simplify function cleanup paths, 457often allowing many goto jumps to be eliminated, through automatic 458free'ing of memory. 459 460The GLib2 library provides a number of functions/macros for enabling 461automatic cleanup: 462 463 `<https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Miscellaneous-Macros.html>`_ 464 465Most notably: 466 467* g_autofree - will invoke g_free() on the variable going out of scope 468 469* g_autoptr - for structs / objects, will invoke the cleanup func created 470 by a previous use of G_DEFINE_AUTOPTR_CLEANUP_FUNC. This is 471 supported for most GLib data types and GObjects 472 473For example, instead of 474 475.. code-block:: c 476 477 int somefunc(void) { 478 int ret = -1; 479 char *foo = g_strdup_printf("foo%", "wibble"); 480 GList *bar = ..... 481 482 if (eek) { 483 goto cleanup; 484 } 485 486 ret = 0; 487 488 cleanup: 489 g_free(foo); 490 g_list_free(bar); 491 return ret; 492 } 493 494Using g_autofree/g_autoptr enables the code to be written as: 495 496.. code-block:: c 497 498 int somefunc(void) { 499 g_autofree char *foo = g_strdup_printf("foo%", "wibble"); 500 g_autoptr (GList) bar = ..... 501 502 if (eek) { 503 return -1; 504 } 505 506 return 0; 507 } 508 509While this generally results in simpler, less leak-prone code, there 510are still some caveats to beware of 511 512* Variables declared with g_auto* MUST always be initialized, 513 otherwise the cleanup function will use uninitialized stack memory 514 515* If a variable declared with g_auto* holds a value which must 516 live beyond the life of the function, that value must be saved 517 and the original variable NULL'd out. This can be simpler using 518 g_steal_pointer 519 520 521.. code-block:: c 522 523 char *somefunc(void) { 524 g_autofree char *foo = g_strdup_printf("foo%", "wibble"); 525 g_autoptr (GList) bar = ..... 526 527 if (eek) { 528 return NULL; 529 } 530 531 return g_steal_pointer(&foo); 532 } 533 534 535QEMU Specific Idioms 536******************** 537 538Error handling and reporting 539============================ 540 541Reporting errors to the human user 542---------------------------------- 543 544Do not use printf(), fprintf() or monitor_printf(). Instead, use 545error_report() or error_vreport() from error-report.h. This ensures the 546error is reported in the right place (current monitor or stderr), and in 547a uniform format. 548 549Use error_printf() & friends to print additional information. 550 551error_report() prints the current location. In certain common cases 552like command line parsing, the current location is tracked 553automatically. To manipulate it manually, use the loc_``*``() from 554error-report.h. 555 556Propagating errors 557------------------ 558 559An error can't always be reported to the user right where it's detected, 560but often needs to be propagated up the call chain to a place that can 561handle it. This can be done in various ways. 562 563The most flexible one is Error objects. See error.h for usage 564information. 565 566Use the simplest suitable method to communicate success / failure to 567callers. Stick to common methods: non-negative on success / -1 on 568error, non-negative / -errno, non-null / null, or Error objects. 569 570Example: when a function returns a non-null pointer on success, and it 571can fail only in one way (as far as the caller is concerned), returning 572null on failure is just fine, and certainly simpler and a lot easier on 573the eyes than propagating an Error object through an Error ``*````*`` parameter. 574 575Example: when a function's callers need to report details on failure 576only the function really knows, use Error ``*````*``, and set suitable errors. 577 578Do not report an error to the user when you're also returning an error 579for somebody else to handle. Leave the reporting to the place that 580consumes the error returned. 581 582Handling errors 583--------------- 584 585Calling exit() is fine when handling configuration errors during 586startup. It's problematic during normal operation. In particular, 587monitor commands should never exit(). 588 589Do not call exit() or abort() to handle an error that can be triggered 590by the guest (e.g., some unimplemented corner case in guest code 591translation or device emulation). Guests should not be able to 592terminate QEMU. 593 594Note that &error_fatal is just another way to exit(1), and &error_abort 595is just another way to abort(). 596 597 598trace-events style 599================== 600 6010x prefix 602--------- 603 604In trace-events files, use a '0x' prefix to specify hex numbers, as in: 605 606.. code-block:: 607 608 some_trace(unsigned x, uint64_t y) "x 0x%x y 0x" PRIx64 609 610An exception is made for groups of numbers that are hexadecimal by 611convention and separated by the symbols '.', '/', ':', or ' ' (such as 612PCI bus id): 613 614.. code-block:: 615 616 another_trace(int cssid, int ssid, int dev_num) "bus id: %x.%x.%04x" 617 618However, you can use '0x' for such groups if you want. Anyway, be sure that 619it is obvious that numbers are in hex, ex.: 620 621.. code-block:: 622 623 data_dump(uint8_t c1, uint8_t c2, uint8_t c3) "bytes (in hex): %02x %02x %02x" 624 625Rationale: hex numbers are hard to read in logs when there is no 0x prefix, 626especially when (occasionally) the representation doesn't contain any letters 627and especially in one line with other decimal numbers. Number groups are allowed 628to not use '0x' because for some things notations like %x.%x.%x are used not 629only in Qemu. Also dumping raw data bytes with '0x' is less readable. 630 631'#' printf flag 632--------------- 633 634Do not use printf flag '#', like '%#x'. 635 636Rationale: there are two ways to add a '0x' prefix to printed number: '0x%...' 637and '%#...'. For consistency the only one way should be used. Arguments for 638'0x%' are: 639 640* it is more popular 641* '%#' omits the 0x for the value 0 which makes output inconsistent 642